Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 067
Original file (2012 067.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2012-067

CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.6, ART 12.B.18, JKA, Pattern
of Misconduct, RE4

BY DRB
CORRECTIONS

TIS 4 yrs, 2 months, 22 days
Policy Implications | None |

 

      
     

  

 

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct in the Summer of 2010.

The applicant received two NJP’s within a four month period. Additionally, the applicant’s record contains
documentation of numerous counseling attempts and repeated failures on the part of the applicant to comply

with military orders and responsibilities.

The applicant was properly notified of the intent to discharge and afforded due process in accordance with

applicable policy. The Board finds that the applicant’s character of service and reenlistment code are justified
based upon the repeated misconduct, and the applicant’s performance and conduct failures.

The applicant has not substantiated any error or inequity.

Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Concur with Board. No relief.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 047

    Original file (2014 047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board endorses an administrative change to amend the Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions based on the issuance of ALCOAST 562/08. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General Discharge, with an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 024

    Original file (2014 024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon notification of the command’s intent to discharge the applicant, the applicant made a statement and objected to discharge. Despite the pattern of indebtedness, the Board finds that the applicant’s Narrative Reason for Separation of Misconduct is not properly aligned with separations stemming from financial irresponsibility. Discharge: No change 25.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 067

    Original file (2013 067.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-067 CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.6A, 12-B-18, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 BY DRB CORRECTIONS Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions. The Board notes that an administrative correction was made by PSC-BOPS in June 2014 to the ‘Character of Service’ on a DD-215 issued. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case following the recently issued DD-215 by PSC in June 2014.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 043

    Original file (2014 043.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant began an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate at a smaller unit of less than 65 personnel. Due to this being 2 NJP’s within 24 months, the command began processing the applicant for Discharge for a Pattern of Misconduct. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 051

    Original file (2013 051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECCEN followed up in late 2006 to indicate that no improvement had been made to eliminate the sizable debt that the applicant had created over a significant amount of time. Additionally, the command formally counseled applicant on the need to change their rating for retention in the service. Discharge: No change | 25.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 056

    Original file (2013 056.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-056 CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, ART 12.B.18, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 BY DRB to JHJ, RE code to RE-3Y, Narrative Reason to Unsatisfactory Performance CORRECTIONS TIS 1 yr, 6 months, 16 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to receiving two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year period. In 2010, the command initiated Discharge proceedings which made...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 032

    Original file (2014 032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NJP results specify that the spouse had suffered a fractured nose and received stitches. The separation package does show an Honorable recommendation from the Sector, but this is due to the pattern of misconduct vice the voluntary plea on the application and supporting statements. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 021

    Original file (2013 021.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1.B.17, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 Honorable None Separation Authority should be amended to COMDTINST M1000.4, Art 1.B.17 TIS 4 yrs, 4 months, 23 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern of Misconduct due to alcohol related incidents, an inappropriate relationship and assaulting another shipmate. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant received a General, Under Honorable Conditions Discharge...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 078

    Original file (2013 078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-078 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.4 ART 1.B.17, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 a BY DRB CORRECTIONS TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 18 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year period. Thereafter, the SPO issued an Under Honorable Conditions character of Service. Based on the final approval made by EPM, the...

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 051

    Original file (2012 051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commands shall document all counseling in accordance with Preparation and Submission of Administrative Remarks (CG-3307).” There is no record of the command complying with these requirements prior to recommending the applicant for discharge. Additionally, the absence of a discharge package and supporting documentation regarding notification of the intent to discharge and appropriate due process being followed is problematic. Therefore, the Board recommends that the applicant’s record be...